Basic question:
Are there any commercial jailbreaking services that can and will,
for a modest fee, exercise their skills to customize the operation
of owner-supplied examples of the iPod/iTouch/iPad genre of
iGadgets? (including removing any iTunes requirements)
If so, I'm a likely customer -- just post your offer here in the
newsgroups or on a web site. (No private offers, please; I only
want to deal with responsible, out in the open providers.)
Background info:
In a post appended below for reference, BreadWithSpam defends the
iTunes controlled, "appliance-centered" approach taken by Apple in all
these gadgets, and I have no quarrel with most of what he says. (I do
still believe Jobs _had_ to include the DRM and related controls built
into the iGadget ecosystem in order to get the deals he wanted from
major content providers, and that this was a primary motivation.)
And, in a further response "Lewis" adds:
Apple doesn't give a **** about jailbreaking. Do they support
it or encourage it, of course not. Do they go out of their way
to prevent it? No, they don't . . . If Apple wanted to stop
jailbreaking, they could do it. They don't care enough to take
those steps.
OK, so I have a couple of earlier iPods sitting around, that I'd like to
have jailbroken so that I could use them to do just two very elementary
tasks: serve as an elementary USB flash drive for any kind of files, and
simultaneously play appropriately formatted audio files that have been
drag and dropped onto them, ***without ever going with 100 miles of any
copy of iTunes***.
Those two capabilities are obviously already built into the internal
libraries or firmware or whatever of these iPods. Anyone want to make a
responsible, public, commercial offer to break them loose, while
discarding any other capabilities that may have to be lost. If so, I'm
a potential customer
================================================
EARLIER POST:
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>
> Um, no. There's no correlation between the use of iTunes to load files
> on the device and a requirement for DRM.
>
> There is a correlation between using iTunes and the fact that
> the OS is designed to keep users from mucking about in the filesystem.
> While you may find that annoying (and I find it annoying every once
> in a while), for the most part, it's there to keep people from
> screwing up the machine. That's part of how it remains
> "appliance-like".
>
> If it annoys you so much, then it's clear that you are not the
> target audience.
>
> And it clearly has some shortcomings - which Apple is trying to
> work around through things like the "send file to app" functionality
> they've recently added. But the notion of keeping files with their
> associated apps and organized by those apps is a fascinating
> experiment in appliance-ification. And has nothing whatsoever to
> do with DRM except in your imagination.
>
> Whether it ends up successful, we'll find out eventually. But
> kudos to Apple for trying to come up with a machine which is
> awfully difficult for a user to screw up.